Question
1 to 20 are based on this passage
收藏
笔记
反馈
Tip:单击查看句义；划选/双击查生词
One of S?ren Kierkegaard's recurring philosophical preoccupations was the study of morality. |~His writing touches upon whether there is an external, objective ethical standard, such as the Ten Commandments, or if there is something beyond ethics upon which right and wrong were predicated.| Kierkegaard's thinking trends towards the latter. Traditional Hegelianism would assert that there is an external code from which any deviation is unjustified. Kierkegaard's view is more nuanced. To illustrate his point, he cited the biblical story of Abraham and Isaac. In the story, God instructs Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac. Kierkegaard points out that this is abhorrent by any normative code of ethics, but that Abraham is traditionally regarded as having behaved virtuously. |~He resolves the apparent contradiction by suggesting that morality is subject to teleological suspension of the ethical, from the Greek telos, meaning "end," or "goal."| He saw Abraham as a paradigm of morality vis-à-vis his faith in that telos. At the conclusion of the biblical narrative, Abraham obeys the command to sacrifice his son, but at the last second his hand is stopped by divine intervention, thus sparing his son.
Question 1
What are the purposes of the two highlighted sentences?
A. The first asserts the primary argument; the second refutes it.
B. The first introduces the topic; the second provides the conclusion to the argument.
C. The first states the argument; the second provides the conclusion.
D. The first is a topic sentence; the second states the main argument.
E. The first is the author's conclusion; the second is a counterargument.
我的答案： 无