您IP所在的地区,暂不支持官方真题素材

建议使用其他功能进行阅读练习

返回
小站备考
托福
托福阅读
Official51阅读真题

OFFICIAL51 In paragraph 4, why does the author mention the cities of Hierakonpolis and Elkab?

展开
Memphis: United Egypt's First Capital
Tip:单击查看句义;划选/双击查生词
QQ20170920171137.pngThe city of Memphis, located on the Nile near the modern city of Cairo, was founded around 3100 B.C. as the first capital of a recently united Egypt. The choice of Memphis by Egypt's first kings reflects the site's strategic importance. First, and most obvious, the apex of the Nile River delta was a politically opportune location for the state's administrative center, standing between the united lands of Upper and Lower Egypt and offering ready access to both parts of the country. The older predynastic (pre-3100 B.C.) centers of power, This and Hierakonpolis, were too remote from the vast expanse of the delta, which had been incorporated into the unified state. Only a city within easy reach of both the Nile valley to the south and the more spread out, difficult terrain to the north could provide the necessary political control that the rulers of early dynastic Egypt (roughly 3000-2600 B.C.) required.

The region of Memphis must have also served as an important node for transport and communications, even before the unification of Egypt. The region probably acted as a conduit for much, if not all, of the river-based trade between northern and southern Egypt. Moreover, commodities (such as wine, precious oils, and metals) imported from the Near East by the royal courts of predynastic Upper Egypt would have been channeled through the Memphis region on their way south. In short, therefore, the site of Memphis offered the rulers of the Early Dynastic Period an ideal location for controlling internal trade within their realm, an essential requirement for a state-directed economy that depended on the movement of goods.

Equally important for the national administration was the ability to control communications within Egypt. The Nile provided the easiest and quickest artery of communication and the national capital was, again, ideally located in this respect. Recent geological surveys of the Memphis region have revealed much about its topography in ancient times. It appears that the location of Memphis may have been even more advantageous for controlling trade, transport, and communications than was previously appreciated. Surveys and drill cores have shown that the level of the Nile floodplain has steadily risen over the last five millenniums. When the floodplain was much lower, as it would have been in predynastic and early dynastic times, the outwash fans (fan-shaped deposits of sediments) of various wadis (stream-beds or channels that carry water only during rainy periods) would have been much more prominent features on the east bank. The fan associated with the Wadi Hof extended a significant way into the Nile floodplain, forming a constriction in the vicinity of Memphis. The valley may have narrowed at this point to a mere three kilometers, making it the ideal place for controlling river traffic.

Furthermore, the Memphis region seems to have been favorably located for the control not only of river-based trade but also of desert trade routes. The two outwash fans in the area gave access to the extensive wadi systems of the eastern desert. In predynastic times, the Wadi Digla may have served as a trade route between the Memphis region and the Near East, to judge from the unusual concentration of foreign artifacts found in the predynastic settlement of Maadi. Access to, and control of, trade routes between Egypt and the Near East seems to have been a preoccupation of Egypt’s rulers during the period of state formation. The desire to monopolize foreign trade may have been one of the primary factors behind the political unification of Egypt. The foundation of the national capital at the junction of an important trade route with the Nile valley is not likely to have been accidental. Moreover, the Wadis Hof and Digla provided the Memphis region with accessible desert pasturage. As was the case with the cities of Hierakonpolis and Elkab, the combination within the same area of both desert pasturage and alluvial arable land (land suitable for growing crops) was a particularly attractive one for early settlement; this combination no doubt contributed to the prosperity of the Memphis region from early predynastic times.

12.In paragraph 4, why does the author mention the cities of Hierakonpolis and Elkab?

你的答案:
正确答案:B
题目解析:
 后才能查看题目解析,还没有账号? 马上注册
【题目翻译】在第4段中,作者为什么提到Hierakonpolis和Elkab的城市? A:表明孟菲斯自古以来的繁荣程度。 B:比较孟菲斯地区与它们相似的特征组合,为早期定居提供优势。 C:确定孟菲斯创建者在规划国家首都时遵循的模式。 D:建议在同一地区荒漠牧场和冲积可耕地的结合非常普遍。 【判定题型】:根据题干问法“why …… mention”,题目询问“ the cities of Hierakonpolis and Elkab”(文章引用内容)的修辞目的,可以判断本题为修辞目的题。 【关键词定位】:根据关键词“ the cities of Hierakonpolis and Elkab”,定位到Passage 4 最后一句,原句为As was the case with the cities of Hierakonpolis and Elkab, the combination within the same area of both desert pasturage and alluvial arable land (land suitable for growing crops) was a particularly attractive one for early settlement; this combination no doubt contributed to the prosperity of the Memphis region from early predynastic times. 【引用内容分析】本段最后一句,意思是“沙漠牧场和冲积耕地(适合耕种农作物的土地)在同一片区域的结合,使这片地区成为一个特别有吸引力的早期定居点;这样的组合无疑促进了前王朝时代早期孟斐斯地区的繁荣。”再来看前一句话“Moreover, the Wadis Hof and Digla provided the Memphis region with accessible desert pasturage.”通过结合这两句话,我们可知孟斐斯和Hierakonpolis and Elkab一样,都是沙漠牧场和冲积耕地结合的地区,因此作者举例是为了说明沙漠牧场和冲积耕地,同样能够促进孟斐斯的繁荣,为定居提供有利条件,这也是孟斐斯选址所考虑的一个重要原因。 【选项分析】 A选项:举例说明孟斐斯早期的繁荣水平。错误,因为作者举这两个城市的例子,并不是为了说明早期的孟斐斯有多么的繁荣,而是为了强调它们拥有相似的地理特征,这一地理特征对城市繁荣非常有利。故A选项排除。 B选择:符合文章意思,正确。 C选项:建造者是参照这两座城市来建造孟斐斯的。错误,因为文章没有提及该信息。故C排除。 D选项:说明在该地沙漠牧场和冲积耕地的结合非常普遍。错误,文章没有提及该信息,而且这不是作者举这两个城市的例子的主要目的。故D排除。

学习页面

Medi

terr

anean

加强 + 政府 + 名词后缀

加强的政府——管理

原文例句

加入生词

本文生词 0

色块区域是你收藏过的生词;

查询次数越多,颜色越深哦~

显示文中生词

登录后才能收藏生词哦,现在登录注册>

本文重点词 45

文中加粗单词为本文重点词;

根据词频与核心词范围精心挑选,托福考试必掌握词汇。

显示文中重点词
学习本文词汇

文中划选/双击的生词、加粗重点词已收纳至词盒

可随时点击词盒查看哦~

只有在词句精学模式下才能开启词盒功能哦~

我知道了

词盒
收藏
笔记
我的笔记
5000
保存
反馈